It's more efficient (power : yellowcake ratio) than 1 breeding level 3 FBR + 4 no breeding reactor configuration (no NR configuration) but it uses a lot of workers tho
I love the solver. Can you release it on Github?
How come it says EP_D is more efficient than EP_E/F + CP_D/E when the other one uses less power and workers? Plus you need a lot of Plutonium and Uranium 20% for asteroids.
um I've posted my code at https://discord.com/channels/803508556325584926/888851931559260162/1387823097725452408
EP_D (this recipe got x0.5 power consumption multiplier) require 4 MW for 4 core fuel, EP_E/F + CP_D/E require 4.4MW for 4 core fuel (and require extra salt) so.
and this BP is for power and not for space stuff but u can stop some fbr and use CP_D/E to get Plutonium and Uranium 20% ofcourse
hey NEET
i use your 5 fbr BP with the one on 3x breeding (1040MW) which works great and i am wondering on this BP if the tiny gain in power/uranium out weight the added maintenance deficit you're gaining by adding 4 nuclear reactors + added infrastructure (rods + mox?).
5 fbr BP is 1020MW/216uranium = 4.72MW/1uranium and this BP is 1500MW/245uranium = 6.12MW/1uranium so it's around 30% more efficient ,whether you think this 30% is a lot or a little is up to you tho
Comments (7)