When removing an exclusive zone from bi-directional tracks, <b>always replace it with a no-stopping zone</b>. Having a naked bi-directional track without exclusive and no-stipping zones will almost certainly result in trains blocked head-to-head.
trains tutorial
Sign in to submit translations and participate in voting
Sign in to participate in translation activities
OR

Suggestion from Sy5temVX submitted for review - March 4, 2026

在移除双向轨道上的<b>独占区</b>时,<b>请务必将其替换为禁停区</b>。如果双向轨道没有任何互斥或禁停规则约束,几乎必然会导致火车对头卡死。

Suggestion from hexinke was approved by hexinke - March 4, 2026

在移除双向轨道的“互斥区”时,请务必将其替换为“禁停区”。如果双向轨道没有任何互斥或禁停规则约束,极有可能会导致火车发生“对头卡死”。

Suggestion from TOMMIVS was rejected by hexinke - March 4, 2026

从双向轨道移除独占区时,<b>请始终将其替换为禁停区</b>。一条没有独占区也没有禁停区的双向轨道几乎一定会导致火车对向阻塞。

Suggestion from Vibrance was rejected by hexinke - March 4, 2026

从双向轨道中删除专属区域时,<b>请始终将其替换为禁停区</b>。拥有一条没有专属区和禁停区的裸露双向轨道几乎肯定会导致火车对向阻塞。

Suggestion from TOMMIVS submitted for review - July 13, 2025

从双向轨道移除独占区时,<b>请始终将其替换为禁停区</b>。一条没有独占区也没有禁停区的双向轨道几乎一定会导致火车对向阻塞。

Suggestion from Vibrance submitted for review - June 1, 2025

从双向轨道中删除专属区域时,<b>请始终将其替换为禁停区</b>。拥有一条没有专属区和禁停区的裸露双向轨道几乎肯定会导致火车对向阻塞。